Writing Policy Briefs; or, Why your science matters

graphic showing connections between scientists, boundary organizations, and other interested parties

Consider direct and indirect connections.

Why isn't my science paper enough?

  • Much science remains behind paywalls.
  • Policymakers and their staff usually don’t subscribe to scientific journals. There is not time to read peer-reviewed literature, and it can be a challenge to understand context and implications.
  • Their ranges of expertise are often outside of science, so disciplinary jargon is a barrier to understanding. Acronyms confuse, and statistics and plots can't tell a story on their own.

Science papers don’t create personal relationships. Your translation to policymaker interests and language is needed!

Policy Briefs are common tools in a familiar package

Briefs work in many contexts—from all levels of government to the private sector, including non-profits and small community groups. Decision makers want:

  • local information from local or regional sources
  • information updates that connect with planning timelines
  • settled science

Your Brief can facilitate direct scientist and decision maker relationship building

  • Think of your Brief as your science business card
  • Establish yourself as a topical expert & contact
  • Determine your primary point of contact, and check in when you have new Briefs
  • Think broadly about who will be most interested in your work
  • Ask questions about what is most helpful and needed

Tips for writing successful policy briefs

  • Focus mostly on what we do know and information that can be used for actionable decision making
  • Carefully consider what this audience needs to know for making decisions
  • Avoid jargon
  • Use impactful images
  • Identify research contacts who are prepared to respond promptly
  • See our Tips for Creating a Good Arctic Answer Brief for more details.
A collection of policy briefs on scientific topics.